Fixes that draft themselves. Ships only what you approve.
A gap without a fix is just bad news. Playbooks turn every diagnosis — a lost prompt, a decaying page, a factual error in answers — into a researched, on-brand draft waiting for your review.
Research first. Draft second. Human always.
- 1
Start from evidence
Every playbook begins with what answers currently cite for the target prompt — formats, sources, angles — so drafts compete with what's actually winning, not a template.
- 2
Ground in your brand
Drafts pull from your brand kit, tone rules, product facts, and knowledge base. Ten simultaneous runs still sound like you.
- 3
Gate on approval
Nothing publishes without an explicit human sign-off. Review, edit, or reject — the gate is structural, not a setting you can forget.
- 4
Publish and measure
Approved content exports to your CMS or as clean markup, gets submitted to AI search, and its target metric is tracked before and after.
Playbooks for the work AEO actually requires.
Answer-ready FAQ
Structured FAQ sections engineered for the formats engines cite, targeted at prompts you're losing.
Content refresh
Pages losing citation share get updated drafts that preserve what worked and repair what decayed.
Comparison hub
Head-to-head pages for the 'X vs Y' and 'alternatives' prompts your rivals currently own.
Fact-drift correction
When answers repeat outdated claims about you, generate the canonical facts page that gives engines a current source.
Community response
Disclosure-first reply drafts for the threads shaping your answers — reviewed, attributed, human-posted.
Earned-media brief
Pitch briefs for the roundups and review sites that dominate citations in your category.
Volume is not a strategy.
Unreviewed AI content at scale is how brands end up cited for claims they never made — or flagged as spam by the very engines they're courting. Playbooks optimize for citation-worthiness per piece, not pieces per month.
- Transparent metering: see the estimated cost of a run before you start it
- Every draft carries its research trail — sources visible, claims traceable
- Brand-kit grounding keeps ten parallel drafts in one voice
- Approval history gives your compliance team a full audit trail
Batch mode, when you need it
Run a playbook across a hundred inputs — every product page, every decayed article, every open FAQ gap — with each row visible, editable, and individually approvable. Scale the drafting, never the risk: the human gate applies per item, not per batch.
Playbooks FAQ
Is this just an AI writing tool?
No. Writing tools start from a blank prompt. Playbooks start from your measurement data — which prompts you're losing, what's being cited instead, what your brand kit says — and end with tracked impact. The draft is the middle step, not the product.
Can it publish automatically?
It can publish after approval — to your CMS or as export-ready markup. There is deliberately no fully-autonomous mode; the approval gate is architectural.
How is usage priced?
Metered transparently by run, with the estimated cost shown before you start and the actual cost logged after. No opaque credit math — your usage ledger is visible in settings.
Will engines penalize AI-assisted content?
Engines reward content that answers well and gets cited by others — and demote thin, repetitive sludge regardless of who wrote it. The research-first, human-reviewed approach exists precisely to keep you in the first category.
Turn your next gap into a drafted fix.
Self-serve. Transparent pricing. No sales call required.